| “I always start a play by
calling the characters A, B and C.” |
Davies:
| “Davies was based on
a tramp who was brought back to the house on Chiswick High Road
where Pinter was living in the 1950’s. Pinter always claims
he didn’t get to know this tramp particularly well - he
would meet him on the stairs and they’d exchange a few
words. When the tramp had been thrown out of the house he bumped
into him and I think Pinter gave him a bob or two a few weeks
later to help him on his way. But it was the strange mixture
of loneliness and aggression that made up his character that
Pinter saw as dramatically profitable.” Michael
Billington - Pinter at the BBC www.bbc.co.uk/pinter |
Davies is probably the most important character in The Caretaker,
he remains on stage for most of the play. He is; unattractive, and
shabbily dressed. A total failure. Despite his dislikable characteristics,
Pinter makes him a credible character - in him we can see elements
of our own character (all be it unpleasant characteristics like
selfishness).
Lonely and alone Davies trusts no one - the world is a dangerous
and incomprehensible place. It is a world of hardships, of sleeping
rough, menial and meaningless temporary jobs, of not having enough
to eat and of having to walk to all the way to Luton in the hope
of blagging a pair of shoes.
His identity is always in doubt. He uses two names Mac Davies and
Bernard Jenkins. He claims Jenkins is an assumed name but it is
difficult to tell if this is just another of his lies like his stories
of serving in the colonies. Davies has spend his life on the margins
of society and has an animal instinct for survival. We see this
in the way he constantly changes his persona and memories to reflect
those around him.
Davies comes to terms with his own failure by blaming others -
the blacks, Poles, Greeks, employers his wife etc are all criticized.
His sense of grievance is illustrated throughout the play. At first
grateful to Aston for his kindness Davies soon finds reason for
complaint. Through Davies Pinter illustrates our ready acceptance
to blame others for our own failures.
| "Davies, however, is sharp and clever,
but it's a sharpness that is born of his hatred of other peoples
ideas. Also the feeling that other people are always trying
to deceive him." Donald Pleasence from The
Life and Work of Harold Pinter by Michael Billington. |
Davies craves respect but has no self respect. He is selfish and
he is a racist. Because of his situation and uncertain existence
he is deferential to Aston until he betrays him when he decides
to ally himself with Mick who he sees as the more powerful of the
two brothers. His downfall is his inability to comprehend the concept
of sibling protection, misreading Mick's intentions leads to his
rejection by Aston. Davies is a perfect example of a man who is
both persecuted and a persecutor.
| “I think Pinter’s characters
are strangers to themselves… Davies in The Caretaker
is a man who’s lived on the margins of life and is therefore
suspicious and wary of everyone around him but lacks a sense
of definition and it’s very interesting who that character
keeps changing his persona depending on who he’s with.
He even has two names - he could be Davies, he could be Jenkins
and he doesn’t know who he is until he gets his papers
which are down in Sidcup.” Michael Billington
- Pinter at the BBC www.bbc.co.uk/pinter |
Pinter shows us how unpleasant Davies is but he also arouses our
sympathy for him. He is violent, selfish, complaining, disloyal,
idle, violent and obsesses with his own survival. Yet Pinter also
arouses our compassion for Davies at the end of the play as he begs
Aston not to throw him back onto the streets.
| "... the character of Davies in The Caretaker
was somebody that the audience immediately felt: Ooh, I don't
really want to know about this man. He's an invader, he's a
squatter, he's somebody who worries us, and yet we want to see
that happens to him." Interview with Timothy West
for British Library The Theatre Archive Project, University
of Sheffield and AHRB. |
Mick:
Aston’s brother. His actions are motivated by his protectiveness
for Aston and resentment of Davies’ relationship with him.
He owns the house and could simply evict Davies but in deference
to his brothers feelings he chooses to enter into a long term power
game with Davies attempting to trick him into making himself unpopular
with Aston, so in the end Aston asks Davies to leave of his own
accord.
Mick’s dream is to convert part of the house into a penthouse
flat that he will share with his brother. This illustrates the close
bond he has with his brother, (his imagination), whilst showing
us the sadness of his life.
He is concerned about Aston’s mental history and its effect
on him. He has set Aston up in the house with the view to his rehabilitation.
Despite their close bond, their relationship is contradictory and
complex.
Mick’s fluent use of language contrasts both with Aston and
Davies and illustrates his intelligence. It also illustrates his
clever and devious nature - he dominates Davies and uses his linguistic
skills against him; and backs that verbal dominance up with brute
force.
His behaviour is erratic and violent (he subjects Davies to both
mental and physical violence). Mick’s sadistic, mocking nature
means he takes pleasure in unsettling Davies as seen in his interrogation
of Davies at the start of Act II.
Mick switches between hostility and friendship in his relationship
with Davies in his attempt to gain power over him. He continually
tests Davies, setting traps for him and trying to trick him into
revealing his real character.
Aston:
| “Vivien was always very upset that
I had written the play about this Aston-character. She felt
that in some way I had betrayed him. But I didn’t understand
that I said, ‘How could I betray him because I’m
on his side?’ I liked him very much I was very sympathetic
to him.” Harold Pinter |
Mick’s older brother, he is around 30 years old.
Aston is generous in contrast to his brother Mick. Aston is gentle
and calm, enduring Davies continual complaints. He rescues Davies
from a potential fight, bringing him into his home. After inviting
him back to his house Aston still tries to care for Davies. He offers
him, tobacco, somewhere to sleep, gives him money and replaces the
bag he has lost.
At the end of the second act Aston reveals what might be behind
his calm, generous nature. He tells Davies of his electric shock
treatment, of how he thought he would die and his reluctance to
speak to people after the treatment. The world beyond the house
is dangerous and frightening to Aston.
| “At the beginning of the play, Aston
hasn’t spoken to anyone for ten years.” Pinter
talking to Kenneth Cranham from The Life and Work of Harold
Pinter by Michael Billingham. |
His speech is short and suggests he has difficulty in formulating
thoughts and expressing them. Throughout the play he is always busy
(mending the plug) but he never seems to get anything done. He keeps
himself busy in order to fill up his life.
His appearance, (he is dressed in a suit), may be a way of indicating
that he is trying to fit into society. Yet its incompatibility to
the job he is trying to complete (building a shed and renovating
the top floor of the house) may represent the fact that he is still
outside that society.
Aston’s world is connected with violence. While he remains
passive other people around him react with violence (Davies draws
a knife on him), and violent acts are carried out against him (the
electric shock treatment). He is a passive resister; he attempts
to escape from the hospital.
| “The author’s
position is an odd one. In a sense he is not welcomed by the
characters. The character’s resist him, they are not
easy to live with, they are impossible to define. You certainly
can’t dictate to them. To a certain extent you play
a never-ending game with them, cat and mouse, blind man’s
bluff, hide and seek. But finally you find that you have people
of flesh and blood on your hands, people with will and an
individual sensibility of their own, made of out component
parts you are unable to change, manipulate or distort.”
Harold Pinter |
|